The example of Mancroft and his ridiculous statements on Fox hunting just goes to illustrate how out of touch and self-serving "old money" really is. PUBLIC LAW - House of Lords "The House of Lords should be abolished. A similar proportion of Leavers and Remainers (76% respectively) said that the Lords should be either abolished or elected (in part/in full). Powers of the Crown 20th December 2017 . Whilst I agree the Upper House should be elected and we shouldn't pay deference to titled people, now is not the time. Support cuts across parties, the Remain and Leave divide, north and south. Mencken, an old-line Liberal, has described the approach of the Federal Republicans as "a history of compromises with the new forces, of gradual yielding, for strategic purposes, to ideas that are intrinsically at odds with its . The UK has a bicameral chamber in their Parliament, which means that there are two houses of Parliament. When justifying the House of Lords in the English Constitution (1867), Walter Bagehot thought it . @IainDale | @Fox_Claire | #CrossQuestion . Filip Nawrocki , lives in The United Kingdom " Thus, the British people are calling for reforms in which politicians and not royals would be elected to the House of Lords in a manner . Why The House Of Lords Shouldn't Be Abolished But Reformed The House of Lords could be something great if governments weren't too afraid or selfish to change it for the better. A debate exists as to whether the HofL should be abolished, given the fact they are unelected, yet have a say in legislation. The revelations of cash for peerages has resulted in a few members of opposition parties calling for the House of Lords to be abolished. The former MEP caused controversy when she refused to apologise for historical support of the IRA bombing in Warrington that killed two children. So, in light of recent events, perhaps now is as good a time as any to look at why this . That's the question students are asked to consider in this From the Source activity for Edexcel A-Level Politics. The House of Lords should be abolished, leaving the House of Commons as the sole legislative body of Parliament. More details Sign this petition 2,729 signatures Show on a map 10,000 A peerage should be earned, not inherited. If the people are to be sovereign, the House of Lords needs to be abolished. Reference: "It is a democratic necessity to abolish the unelected and outdated House of Lords and replace it with an elected second chamber." theguardian.com. Abolish the House of Lords. The Conservative 2019 manifesto committed to . Yet the 'Red' corridor's surrounding our second chamber, the House of Lords were not on the tour. Readers' poll: should the House of Lords be abolished? The House of Lords is a chamber of experts. Lucy Pegg No "The House of Lords is useless and dangerous to the people of England." This was the statement made in an historic move whereby the House of Lords was abolished on the 19th March 1649 by an Act of Parliament. The Government of the day make the decisions, we elect them to do that. It wasn't surprising that . Tread carefully, opposition parties. Given 'New' Labour's landslide number of 419 MPs (out of 659 =2/3) on 43% of votes cast nationwide, all of which committed in their manifesto to reforming the second chamber by removing the voting rights of hereditary peers as a first step. The House of Lords could be dissolved, but it probably shouldn't because it is one half of Britain's parliament. "The time for Hereditary and 'Honour' Peers has gone, as a democratic nation we should be able to vote for a second House (Like the American Senate)" Davie J, Hampshire "Unelected legislators are a ludicrous anachronism in principle: the Lords must either be simply abolished (unicameral legislatures aren't so bad) or rendered democratic" James, Perth Mencken, an old-line Liberal, has described the approach of the Federal Republicans as "a history of compromises with the new forces, of gradual yielding, for strategic purposes, to ideas that are intrinsically at odds with its . Originally Answered: Why cant the house of lords be abolished? Membership is by appointment, heredity or official function.Like the House of Commons, it meets in the Palace of Westminster in London . Yet to abolish the Lords and either replace it with another elected chamber, or not replace it at all ( . Max Shanly. For the House of Lords does not deserve the obloquy being heaped upon it from both Right and Left obloquy that is laced with hypocrisy. The commission's recommendations were rejected by a vote in the House of Lords. Abolishing the Lords would be an act of constitutional vandalism, of elective dictatorship. The House of Lords should be replaced with a Senate of . Should the House of Lords be abolished? In the past 12 months the House of Lords has made almost 2,300 changes to improve legislation; apart from daily oral questions, peers have tabled more than 8,000 written questions and taken part . Parliament was torn between . Angel1. House of Lords should be scrapped, says SNP. Parliament's upper chamber has become larger and more expensive. The House of Lords, as we shall see, fulfils tasks that complement the work of the Commons, but it does not challenge the capacity of Government, with a parliamentary majority, to get its way. The House of Lords should be abolished The House of Lords is irrelevant in modern life and detrimental to our democracy. 07 Jun 2022 Just like the monarchy and private schools, it is symptomatic of a society which pays lip service to democracy and meritocracy but so often falls short of achieving it in reality. The House of Lords works well. The House of Lords is currently the second largest legislative chamber in the world, behind China. It gave hereditary peers the right to disclaim their titles, and for women peers to sit in the Upper House of the British Parliament for the first time. The Lords must be abolished as a matter of democratic urgency. The Stage 1 reform is committed to continuing the transformation and ultimately getting rid of the remaining 92 hereditary peers. That should be a source of shame and it undermines the UK when it talks about abuses of governments in other parts of the world. According to polling last year by Survation, 71 per cent of Britons back overhauling the House of Lords. I think they are actually going to do it. Deemed to be a threat, the House of Lords would not meet until twelve years later in 1660 after the restoration of the monarchy. Abolishing the House. . The House of Lords must be reformed and ultimately abolished. It was one of the first acts of the only dictator we ever had: Oliver Cromwell. The unelected House of Lords has continually faced controversy for their unaccountability and excessive power. The House adds value to the political process without challenging the accountability that is at the heart of the system of government. TikTok video from Natalie Bennett (@nataliebennettgreen): "We should abolish the whole power to deprive people of citizenship. That seemed like a pretty definite thing. For users that answer more than once (yes we know), only their most recent answer is counted in the total results. And they have changed. It's sketchy, but I think I can recall a few newspapers talking about the house of lords being scheduled to be abolished and replaced with a British Senate. Ed Miliband is expected to set out the plans later today at his party's . One is . The House of Lords is a relic from a bygone era. Lord Sewel has resigned from the House of Lords after being filmed allegedly taking drugs with prostitutes. Observations from The Minister for the Constitution and Devolution (Chloe Smith): The Government have no plans to abolish the House of Lords, which has a key role in scrutinising the Executive and as a revising Chamber; it is important that the way it is constituted reflects that role and the primacy of the House of Commons as the elected Chamber. By Jonathan Clark There will be more referenda, and the first loser will be the House of Lords The House of Lords survived because it pragmatically reinvented itself as an innocent revising chamber No legal barrier effectively stops the Remainer Lords in their course For the House of Lords does not deserve the obloquy being heaped upon it from both Right and Left obloquy that is laced with hypocrisy. The Labour Party should be . Total percentages may not add up to exactly 100% as we allow users to submit "grey area" stances that may not be categorized into yes/no stances. The British constitution is antiquated, even in the most flattering light. The House of Commons is the elected chamber and they have a veto power whereas the House of Lords . BORIS JOHNSON'S Brexit deal has now cleared the House of Lords after briefly stalling in Parliament's upper chamber, paving the way for it to become law ahead of the January 31 EU exit date. As if that weren't bad enough, 26 bishops appointed by the Church of England are members of the House of Lords, making the UK the only country apart from Iran to have clerics in government as a right. For most of Labour's history, our policy has been to abolish the House of Lords or have an elected second chamber. The other house is just a retirement home for redundant Politicians, and Prime Ministers favourites. Lord Steel will tell a lecture to the Scottish Liberal Club on Tuesday evening that peerages should be scrapped to make way for federalism in the UK. The Parliament Act 1911 removed the ability of the House of Lords to veto money bills; with any other bills, the House of Commons was given powers to overrule the Lords' veto after three parliamentary sessions. These can be forgiven. The House of Lords Act in 1999 severely diminished the roles and member of the Lords and only allowed some 92 hereditary peers to remain in the House. In a personal film for the Daily Politics soapbox series, Richard . It was one of the first acts of the only dictator we ever had: Oliver Cromwell. Liberal, Labour and Conservative governments have all sailed into the Bermuda Triangle of Lords reform, though few have completed the voyage. To do this would be to abolish the House of Lords altogether and start afresh in a way that was useful and constructive. It is easy to chastise the House of Lords as a cesspit for all that is wrong with our democracy, yet a look underneath the country's constitutional bonnet shows that reform rather than riddance is what the House of Lords really needs. For the last 30 years, the Federal Republican Party has dominated the American electoral system. A peerage should be earned, not inherited. The cost of the House of Lords has ballooned. 646 views | original sound - Natalie Bennett 10.6K thegreatawakening74 philemon olale in conclusion, if there was ever a time to reform the lords it would be now: the current chamber sits in limbo as a half-way house after labour's last attempt at reform in 1999; as a result of the 2005 constitutional reform act the office of lord chancellor has been has been stripped of its legal and legislative functions, and the law lords are Answer: Yes. Again. A clear majority of Britons (58%) supports the notion of allowing the people to directly elect their lords. Share . The former MEP caused controversy when she refused to apologise for historical support of the IRA bombing in Warrington that killed two children. The House of Lords should be reformed. However, the doubts over the severity of that action and the effect it would have on the British political system mean that any reform may be a bit of while away. No democratic parliament should include hereditary peers or lifetime appointees. Abolishing the Lords would be an act of constitutional vandalism, of elective dictatorship. Thus far, parliament seems to be working for them and there shouldn't be any drastic changes.